Have I the right to declare something written wrongly? 

And if I do, then have I the right to declare that the wrongly written was righted? 

And even if yes to both of the above, does that bestow upon me the right to question my right to write about the declaring of something as written wrongly? Or to go beyond that and write about the questioning of my right to write about the righting of the wrongly written? 

The above words speak for themselves. I have no such rights. To merely assert them, to merely assume them, to merely postulate them as the axiomatic justifications for criticizing others is simply wrong. Is that not right?