Quote by Shotgun011
Buor
Quote by authorised1960Quote by Shotgun011
Buor
I have Googled this word and can find no match for it anywhere in ANY dictionary, English or otherwise.
In short, this word does not exist in normal speech. I will concede, though, that it may exist as a slang or dialect word, but I have my doubts.
Here is a word that IS an archaic term:
swoopstake: indiscriminately or in an indiscriminate manner
Quote by authorised1960Quote by Shotgun011
Buor
I have Googled this word and can find no match for it anywhere in ANY dictionary, English or otherwise.
In short, this word does not exist in normal speech. I will concede, though, that it may exist as a slang or dialect word, but I have my doubts.
Here is a word that IS an archaic term:
swoopstake: indiscriminately or in an indiscriminate manner
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana
Quote by Shotgun011Quote by authorised1960Quote by Shotgun011
Buor
I have Googled this word and can find no match for it anywhere in ANY dictionary, English or otherwise.
In short, this word does not exist in normal speech. I will concede, though, that it may exist as a slang or dialect word, but I have my doubts.
Here is a word that IS an archaic term:
swoopstake: indiscriminately or in an indiscriminate manner
Victorian Criminal slang no longer used
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana
Quote by Shotgun011Quote by authorised1960Quote by Shotgun011
Buor
I have Googled this word and can find no match for it anywhere in ANY dictionary, English or otherwise.
In short, this word does not exist in normal speech. I will concede, though, that it may exist as a slang or dialect word, but I have my doubts.
Here is a word that IS an archaic term:
swoopstake: indiscriminately or in an indiscriminate manner
Victorian Criminal slang no longer used