Quote by Story Submission Guidelines

• The copyright to stories (and accompanying photos) must be owned by the member uploading them.

• Please ensure submissions fit into the categories found on the home page. While we accept stories featuring sex scenes, we’ve chosen not to include an erotica category for submissions where the entire focus is on sex.

• Any characters engaging in sexual situations must be aged sixteen and over.

• Stories should be under 10,000 words in length, with any longer works broken down and submitted in chapters.

• Submissions for all categories other than Musings, Poetry, Songs and Flash Fiction must be a minimum of 3000 characters. (Approximately six hundred words).

• The Musings category is intended for submissions that ponder the bigger questions in life. It’s not a category for rants or a place to take private disputes public.

• Scenes where child abuse or sexual abuse are described in detail are not permitted. If a character endured either in their past, mentioning it is okay but we don’t accept stories featuring lengthy scenes revolving around the abuse.

• Submissions that contain racist remarks, hate speech or are disrespectful toward others’ religious beliefs, aren’t permitted.

• If your story or poem is more likely to upset or offend rather than entertain, please refrain from submitting it to this site.

Quote by Rumple_deWriter
note to Maggie: Aw shucks, Ms Maggie, those folks are just saying what the rest of us have known all along...no, really...I'm being VERY serious...honest. RdW

For Round 11, guest judge Karen Russell is asking you to send us original short fiction in which a character finds something he or she has no intention of returning.

We are accepting submissions until 11:59 p.m. EDT on Sunday, May 12.

http://www.npr.org/2013/05/04/180596004/three-minute-fiction-round-11-finders-keepers

Many thanks for your new entry into our Flash Fiction Competition. Brilliant!!

We very much appreciate your continuing support...

Kind regards,

[The Contest Organizers]

Quote by gypsy
Strong

Quote by gypsy

Quote by mystic_angel_77
moms -> cops

Hi, and welcome to the games folder!

The rules of this game are found in the first post:

The aim of this game is to create a new word by changing one letter without rearranging the order of the remaining letters.

So, moms cannot become cops, because that is a two letter change, not one.

Back to moms...

moms -> pons

pons
[ponz] Show IPA
noun, plural pon·tes [pon-teez] Show IPA . Anatomy .
1.
Also called pons Varolii. a band of nerve fibers in the brain connecting the lobes of the midbrain, medulla, and cerebrum. See diag. under brain.
2.
any tissue connecting two parts of a body organ or structure.

Quote by Rumple_deWriter
While others may be, perspicacious, I'm more,

persnickety

--note: for an alternate, obscure, word, check the synonym--


Adjective

1 placing too much emphasis on trivial or minor details; fussy.

Synonyms
pernickety

Quote by Lisa
Thanks to Alan for the following link. It contains some helpful suggestions on how to go about critiquing the work of others.

http://www.writingforward.com/writing-tips/tips-for-critiquing-other-writers-work[/quote]

From the same website, excellent advice on how to accept a critique: http://www.writingforward.com/better-writing/critiques-make-your-writing-better

Here is the article in its entirety, but I would advise visiting the link and reading the comments as well.

Critiques Make Your Writing Better, So Grin and Bear Them
Posted by Melissa Donovan on April 26, 2013

How to accept critiques with grace.

It seems like every writer wants someone to read his or her work and provide feedback so they can make their writing better.

Trouble is, many writers want nothing more than praise. When they hear that their writing could actually use some work, some writers freeze up. Others go through the feedback and argue it point by point. A few will even launch into a tirade of sobbing or screaming.

Critiques are designed to help writers, not to offend them or make them feel unworthy. But the human ego is a fragile and funny thing. Some folks simply can’t handle the notion that despite all their hard work, the project they’ve written is less than perfect.

As a writer, you have to decide whether you truly want to excel at your craft. If you do, then you need to put your ego aside and learn how to accept critiques graciously. If you can’t do that, there’s a good chance that your writing will never improve and your work will always be mediocre.

The Importance of Critiques

Critiques are not tools of torture. They are meant to help writers. If the critique is put together in a thoughtful and meaningful way, it should lift the writer’s spirits by pointing out strengths in the piece, but it should also raise some red flags by marking areas that need improvement.

Usually, critiques sting a little. That’s okay. Sometimes, you’ll get lucky and your suspicions about what is weak in your writing will only be confirmed. Other times, you’ll be surprised that the critic found weaknesses in parts of the work that you thought were the strongest.

With practice and by following the tips below, you’ll learn how to overcome your own ego, how to obtain a beneficial critique and evaluate it objectively, apply it to your writing smartly, and for all that, you’ll be a better writer.

Tips for Accepting Writing Critiques, and then Writing Better

- Find someone who is well-read, tactful, honest, and knowledgeable about writing. If you can find a critic who possesses all these traits, then you have overcome the first hurdle.
- Polish your work as much as you can before handing it over. Do not send a rough draft to someone who will be critiquing your work, otherwise much of the feedback you get may address problems you could have found and addressed yourself. The point of a critique is to step beyond your own perspective and abilities. Note: some writers use alpha readers who read the rough draft and then give feedback on the content, usually the story. This is not a critique in the traditional sense. It’s more for testing general ideas.
- Don’t harass the person who is critiquing your work by calling them every day, especially if they’re doing you a favor. If you are working under any kind of deadline, plan accordingly.
- If possible, do not review the critique in the presence of the person who prepared it. The best way to first review a critique is to set aside some time alone.
- You may have an emotional reaction. Some of the feedback may make you angry or despondent. Know that this is normal and it will pass.
- After you review the critique, let it sit for a day or two. In time, your emotions will subside and your intellect will take over. The reasonable part of your brain will step in and you’ll be able to absorb the feedback objectively.
- Revisit the critique with an open mind. Try to treat your own writing as if it were not yours at all. As you review it, ask yourself how the suggestions provided can be applied and envision how they will make your work better.
- Figure out what is objective and what is personal in the critique. Critics are human. Some of their findings may be technical, mistakes that you should definitely fix. Other findings will be highly subjective (this character is unlikable, this dialogue is unclear, etc.). You may have to make judgment calls to determine where the critic is inserting his or her personal tastes.
- Decide what you’ll use and what you’ll discard. Remember that the critic is not in your head and may not see the big picture of your project.
- Thank the critic. After all, he or she took the time to help you, and even if you didn’t like what they had to say or how they said it–even if the critique itself was weak–just be gracious, say thanks, and move on.
- Revise. Now you can take the feedback you’ve received and apply it to your work. Edit and tweak the project based on the suggestions that you think will best benefit the piece.
- Long-term applications: you can apply the feedback to future projects too. Take what you learned from this critique and use it when you’re working on your next project. In this way, your writing (not just a single project) will consistently improve.

In some cases, you may not have any control over who critiques your work. If it’s published, then anyone can assess it. If you’re taking a class or workshop, then peer-to-peer critiques may be required. In cases like these, it’s essential that you keep a cool head. Even if someone is unnecessarily harsh or rude in their (uninvited) delivery, respond tactfully and diplomatically.

If you can obtain useful critiques and apply the feedback to your work, your writing will dramatically improve. Critiques are one of the most effective and fastest tracks to making your writing better. But they won’t help you one bit if you can’t accept them graciously.

Good luck with your critiques, and keep writing.