I often write poetry using traditional formats. Sonnets and villanelles and, perhaps, haikus. Is it important to follow the rules or may one fly free and do whatever they want and still call their work by the traditional name?
Personally, I only write traditional forms of poetry when I want to challenge myself to colour within the lines. So yes, traditional forms of poetry like sonnets and haikus have set rules that need to be adhered to.
That said, there are no rules against coming up with your own style of poetry, it might just be the new 'traditional form of poetry' someday.
“Many people hear voices when no one is there. Some of them are called mad and are shut up in rooms where they stare at the walls all day. Others are called writers and they do pretty much the same thing.”
I think that to call it a specific type of poetry it should meet the definition on that form.
I used to think that poetry was divided into several types, including free verse. I have changed my way of thinking because of the great pieces of work here and how they relate; and also from exchanges with very talented writers of poetry we have.
I know think of all poetry as just poetry, with certain subsets of specialized writing within the whole. I feel that if you changed a sonnet so that it no longer met the standard criteria of a sonnet that it stays poetry, but leaves that specific subset.
Though I used to prefer more formalized styles, I have come to enjoy all forms now. Just wish I could write them half as well as Larry or Yas.
You can't get there from here, because when you get there you're still here and here is now there.