Quote by fuzzy1954Quote by Dreamcatcher
Every member, from the crotchety old man in the corner to the dude at the head of the parade with pom-poms, is entitled to an opinion. As I've explained to a couple of members, it isn't the opinion expressed so much as the manner in which it is presented. Be respectful. Be flexible. Be open-minded and consider all sides of an issue.
There are many ways on SS that an author is lauded and/or recognized for achievement. Ratings, views, RR's, EC's, front cover listings and badges. All of which are subjective. At this point, it's the best we got and tweaking of the processes are currently being considered.
Larryf's well-intentioned post was spot on. These things we are currently discussing should be elements of SS that makes being a member more relevant. We should be more supportive and trumpet the victories of each other rather than assuming that just because one author got a piece of pie means there is none left for anybody else.
Gypsy and Ping are right. We are a community, generously supported by Nicola. Let's not waste the opportunity being offered here and encourage new members, mentor those who want help, and celebrate the endeavors of our friends.
ps. and I'll try not being the crotchety old man in the corner.
I personally agree with Maggie post on this thread. that said
I would like to "throw" my name in the list for the newest badge ... "crotchety old man in the corner" I believe Larry / Dreamcatcher can't be the only one here in Stories
To be fair... and to be accurate... I did not call or refer to Mr. L. Dreamcatcher as the "crotchety old man in the corner."
However, it has come to my attention that he refers to himself as that. So be it. Still not him. His thoughts and opinions are valued.
***
Just wondering if we need so many levels? IDK. Some people have been here for six, seven, eight years, and they still don't have the views to meet the new, proposed criteria. Just sayin'. It almost seems like the numbers still need to be re-worked, or the value of some of the badges should be revisited. Are they all necessary? Do 3000 or 2000 or however many views really make that story a 'famous' story? Seems a tad hyperbolic. I think that's the right word. And I'm not trying to be too graphic.
Out of 9808 stories and poems published, as listed on the main page...
10 stories and/or poems have more than 10,000 views, with one anomaly of over 187,000.
18 stories have between 5000 and 10,000 views
33 stories have between 3000 and 4999 views
27 stories have between 2500 and 2999 views
49 stories have between 2000 and 2499 views
My point being, I think, is that we don't really need anything past Famous and Legendary (or use other label names, if so chosen).
2500 views for famous seems reasonable, given the history and current viewing climate
7500 view for legendary seems reasonable as well
Currently, there are 3 stories that meet the current famous status (30,000 views), and one of those meets current legendary status (100,000 views)
Do we really want or need another level or badge beyond that? Just asking. IDK. I don't think so.
We don't need to make things complicated, just attainable for those that want to attain.
Thoughts?